Page 49 - Cgtmse
P. 49

OVERVIEW   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                                      Schedule

                              Forming Part of the Balance Sheet and Income and Expenditure Account



                    Audit  was conducted on  the record of the trust    amount  ₹`13,38,555/-. Further, the  trust has
                    for the period from F.Y. 2010-11 to 2014-15 under   submitted written submissions on 17.03.2022 and
                    Rule 5A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. On the basis of   16.03.2023. The Adjudication Order disposing the
                    the observations made in the Final Audit Report,    appeal is awaited.
                    Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai       The first appeal preferred against the OIO of the
                    had issued show cause notice dated 18.04.2016       Assistant  Commissioner  (Refund  – II), Service
                    asking the trust to explain as to why-              Tax, Mumbai  with regard to claim of Refund of
                    The  activity of sharing of staff with M/s. SIDBI   the Service Tax paid on services provided to MLI’s
                    should not be classified under “Business Support    located in  Jammu  and Kashmir  amounting  to
                    Service” and Service Tax of ₹`52,156/- along with   ₹`1,07,71,826/- for the period July 2012 to June
                    Interest and penalty should not be demanded and     2014,  was disposed of in  favour  of the Trust  by
                    recovered;                                          the Commissioner (Appeals) CGST vide his Order
                    Service Tax  amounting  `₹1,74,760/-  along         in  Appeal dated  28.08.2018  remanding back the
                    with Interest u/s. 75 on the unutilized  portion    matter to the original adjudicating authority with
                    of  advances  received from  the Development        the direction to grant the refund after verification
                    Commissioner  should not be demanded  and           of the relevant documents  to be produced by
                    recovered.                                          the Trust in support of their claim of Refund. No
                    The response  thereto was filed by the trust  on    notice is received for verification of documents for
                    23.08.2016. Subsequently the Dy. Commissioner       processing the refund claim of the Trust from the
                    of Service tax vide letter dated 24.03.2017 sought   Original Authority.
                    clarification as to whether in relation to the points   The refund application  dated  02.04.2018  for
                    mentioned hereinabove under sub-clause  1) and      claiming refund of ₹`7,54,06,280/- for the period
                    2) of Clause b), the same practice  continued       March – June,  2017  in respect of service tax
                    post 2015. The reply in response thereto has also   paid in advance on the basis of DANs raised for
                    been filed by Trust  vide letter  dated 18.04.2017.   which ultimately no guarantee services have been
                    Personal  hearing of the SCN  was attended  on      rendered  and  which could also not be  adjusted
                    04.03.2021 and 25.03.2022 before of the Deputy      against service tax payable. The same was rejected
                    Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise (Division     vide Order in Original dated 07.12.2018 by Assistant
                    IV), Mumbai. The Adjudication Order disposing the   Commissioner CGST & Central Excise, Division-I,
                    SCN is awaited.                                     Mumbai. The Trust has preferred appeal against
                                                                        the said OIO before the Hon’ble Commissioner of
                    Show Cause Notice from the Commissioner  of
                    Service  Tax -Audit II,  Mumbai  was received on    Service Tax (Appeals)-II, Mumbai on 07.02.2019.
                    22.07.2016  demanding  service  tax  amount  of₹    Further, the Commissioner  (Appeal-I)  GST & CX,
                    `1,78,47,373/- plus applicable interest and penalty,   Mumbai  vide dated 20.08.2020  was allowed  the
                    for  non-  payment  of service tax  on  DAN issued   appeal with consequential relief, subject to detailed
                    before 30.06.2012 but the fee in respect of such    verification.  No communication  is  received
                    DANs were received post 01.07.2012. The written     from the jurisdictional  officer  for  verification  of
                    submission  in response  thereto were  submitted    documents for processing the refund claim of the
                    on  23.08.2016  by  the  Trust.  On 24.03.2021      Trust from the Authority.
                    the personal hearing on  web-ex  platform  was      On the basis of Audit Observations made, pursuant
                    conducted by the Joint Commissioner, CGST and       to conduct of Service tax Audit on the record of
                    Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissioner which      the trust for the period from F.Y. 2016-17 to June
                    was attended.  The department has disposed          -2017  under Rule 5A of Service Tax Rules, 1994
                    the case vide  order dated  31.01.2021  against     Show cause Notice was issued by the Deputy
                    the Trust. In the against order, the Trust has filed   Commissioner, GST & Central  Excise, Division-
                    the appeal before the Commissioner  of  Central     IV, Mumbai East Commissionerate  seeking
                    Excise (Appeals) on 13.09.2021  with pre-deposit    explanation with regard to:






                                                                                                             47
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52